Breazzy vs Amazon Photos: Android Photo Backup Without Prime

Updated May 2026 · 4 min read

TL;DR.

If you already pay $14.99/month for Amazon Prime, Amazon Photos gives you unlimited photo storage at original quality for $0 incremental cost — hard to beat on pure price. Breazzy is the better choice if you do not have Prime, want to own your files, or do not want your photo library tied to your shopping account.

Side-by-side

BreazzyAmazon Photos (Prime)Amazon Photos (standalone)
Cost~$0.60 / 100 GB (B2)$0 if already paying Prime ($14.99/mo)$1.99 / 100 GB
Photo storagePay-as-you-go, unlimited tier-upUnlimited at original quality100 GB capped
Video storageUnlimited, same as photos5 GB cap; uses storage tier afterCounts against quota
Where photos liveYour bucketAmazon's serversAmazon's servers
Original qualityAlwaysAlwaysAlways
Tied to accountNoneAmazon shopping accountAmazon shopping account
If you cancelFiles stay in your bucketLibrary converts to standalone tier; over 100 GB starts deleting after 180 daysOver 100 GB starts deleting after 180 days

Prices verified May 2026.

Where Amazon Photos is better

Where Breazzy is better

Who should pick which?

Pick Amazon Photos if you are a Prime subscriber for other reasons, the unlimited-photos tier covers you indefinitely, you do not mind your library being tied to your shopping account, and your videos fit in 5 GB or you do not care about videos.

Pick Breazzy if you do not have Prime, you have a lot of videos, you want to own your files in a standard S3 bucket, or you simply do not want your photo backup to depend on a shopping company's roadmap. At 1 TB of mixed photos+videos, Breazzy + B2 costs $6/month — less than half what Amazon Photos charges its non-Prime customers for far less storage.